.
Feedback

Unemployment Rate In Madison, Guilford Up; But Labor Force Growing As Well

Trends locally mirroring statewide trends, which show uptick in unemployment, but also more people entering workforce; Experts hoping this means that more people looking for work; State numbers through June, local numbers through May.

 

Editor's Note: Looking for a job? See a list of resources at the bottom of the story. Also, if you know of any good resources, let us know in the comment section after the story.

 

The unemployment rate in both Madison and Guilford ticked up from April to May, to 5.7 percent from 4.7 percent in Madison and to 5.5 percent from 5.3 percent in Guilford.

But Connecticut Department of Labor figures also show the labor force grew in both towns over the same period.

That trend appears to be continuing in June statewide. The state Department of Labor reported Thursday that June's numbers are showing both the "strengths and weaknesses" of the state's economy:

Preliminary June employment estimates for Connecticut show mixed signs entering the summer months. According to the household survey, the unemployment rate for the state rose by three-tenths of a percentage point in June to 8.1%, while the establishment survey estimated that the state added 1,400 jobs (0.1%). Essential private sector job growth in June, however, came in at a strong 5,000 (0.4%) pace led by a gain in the education and health services supersector (3,800, 1.2%). Private sector statewide job growth continued to be offset by large government declines (-3,600, -1.5%) last month, especially from local public administration (-2,900, -1.9%). This sector also includes the state’s casinos.

Strengths and weaknesses

“June’s mixed results are a mirror of the strengths and weaknesses of the current job market,” said Andy Condon, Director of the agency’s Office of Research, in a prepared release that is included as a PDF with this story. “Overall job growth is slow, though the private sector continues to show a decent recovery. Unfortunately, the jump in our unemployment rate indicates we are not growing jobs fast enough to satisfy the need in our economy.”

Local numbers were available through May 2012 and they show that the labor force in Madison grew to 9,868 in May from 9,730 in April and 9,701 in January, when the unemployment rate was 5.8 percent, compared to 5.7 percent in May 2012.

In Guilford, the labor force grew to 13,048 in May from 12,965 in April and 12,839 in January, when the unemployment rate was 5.6 percent, compared to 5.5 percent in May 2012.

In Clinton, the labor force stayed essentially steady, at 7,754 in January, 7,795 in April, and 7,794 in May. The unemployment rate in Clinton was 7.4 percent in January, 6.6 percent in April, and 6.2 percent in May.

Please see the attached PDF for detailed labor force and unemployment rates for the towns of Clinton, Durham, Guilford, Killingworth, Madison, and New Haven. In New Haven, the unemployment rate was 11.6 percent in May 2012.

More people entering workforce

The Hartford Business Journal reported Thursday that the uptick in the unemployment rate statewide in June was due to people entering the workforce:

The unemployment rate, however, edged higher from 7.8 percent to 8.1 percent, largely because more people are entering the workforce.

An expanding labor force, officials say, may signal jobseekers are reentering the labor market, sensing better employment prospects.

Five supersectors showing improvement

The state Department of Labor also reported that five of the state's ten employing "supersectors" showed job increase in June, while five showed declines:

In June 2012, growing supersectors were again led by education and health services (3,800, 1.2%).  This movement was considered statistically significant.  Both segments of this supersector experienced strong job growth with health care and social assistance (2,900, 1.1%) providing the most strength. The educational services (900, 1.4%) also grew.  The leisure and hospitality supersector added 2,000 positions (1.5%) over the month.  The accommodation and food services component increased by 1,100 positions (1.0%) and the arts, entertainment, and recreation component added another 900 (3.8%).  The construction and closely related mining supersector increased by 500 (1.0%).  Individually, the very small mining portion added 100 jobs (20.0%) while the construction sector increased 400 (0.8%).  Specialty trade contractors were especially active for the construction industry in June.  The manufacturingsupersector added 400 jobs (0.2%) in June as the nondurable goods (700, 1.8%) segment produced a statistically significant increase that more than overcame a durable goods (-300, -0.2%) decline.  The professional and business services (100, 0.1%) supersector posted a small gain. 

Supersectors that declined included government, "other services," financial activities, information, and trade-transportation-utilities.

Some positive trends, still room for improvement

Governor Dannel P. Malloy said in a prepared statement that the June statewide numbers showed some positive trends, but added that there is still plenty of room for improvement.

“The addition of 5,000 private sector jobs this month brings the total number of jobs created since January of last year to more than 22,000.  Our unemployment rate is down 13% over the same time period.  And all of this happened while we’ve been working hard to streamline state government, which now has nearly 3,000 fewer employees. 

Malloy added that the June numbers should be put in context.

“It was announced last month that 102,000 private sector jobs were created nationally.  That means with 5,000 private sector jobs created here in Connecticut, our state is responsible for 5% of the country’s job growth in the last month even though we only account for about 1% of the country’s population. We clearly have a long way to go, but let me be clear – job creation continues to be my top priority.

“Part of the reason for the increase announced today is that more people are looking for work, which in and of itself is a good thing.  It means people are increasingly confident that there are good jobs available.  And there is reason to be confident.  With companies like Jackson Laboratories, Alexion and Sustainable Building Systems planning to relocate or expand their operations, we have positioned our state for future job growth.”

Looking for a job? Here are some resources:

Connecticut's Job Bank has the following information about recruitments coming up:

For more information, visit the Connecticut Job Bank web page.

To find Connecticut employers by region, industry, occupation and company, you can visit the state of Connecticut "Search For Employers" page.

Here are some additional resources provided by the state:

 
Education & Training ConneCTion
Job & Career ConneCTion Reemployment Portal Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics Training & Education Planning - Supply-Demand Workforce Employment Dynamics

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Madison Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
JC May 21, 2013 at 05:38 pm
The area north of the farm house across Copse would not have been my first pick. There must be aRead More reason for picking that spot? but, looking at satellite images, if the town owns the land abutting 95 (is that also part of the farm?), it would make more sense to place it in that lower section of the park as it would not be near as many residential homes. The interstate is already noisy and would mask the occasional yip and yap on Saturdays or weekday summer evenings before sunset. I also wonder about the cliffs acting as sound amplifiers? I know, it sounds nuts but, you need to check or, yikes. You want to spend the most time on location work and design. Hopefully the UConn students have an architecture professor leading on the design work?
JC May 21, 2013 at 05:25 pm
I have lived all over the U.S. in areas with dog parks. All were fenced (99% of dog parks ARE fencedRead More and any that are not should be avoided!) All have an area for big dogs, plus an area for little dogs, and an area for "problem" dogs and dog training (reservation based or first come). All three areas are divided by interior fences or located in different sections. Dog parks create no problems at all if built right and managed right. All dogs MUST have a licence and rabies tag on a collar. All dogs must be neutered over 8 months of age. All owners (18 and older) must observe the dog at all times and PICK UP when a gift is left. No children under 12. If your dog was not properly socialized or is an untested aggressive breed, keep them at home until you are sure they are good citizens with strangers and dogs. Only happy dogs who get along with other dogs should EVER visit a dog park. Puppies also should stay away until they are a few months old. Very small toy dogs don't need a dog park and are best kept away. But all the parks I have used were not a problem at all. It is also important to have some parking, seating (benches), and shelter for humans and a bulletin board with rules at the entrance (double gate at each). Some parks are free to town/county residents. Some were owned by the town/county but run by volunteers (these were the best!). Most charged nothing but one charged way too much per year (it was owned and partly run by the county with volunteers). I think any of these combinations could work but, if a yearly permit is issued (proven you have rabies shot, etc.), the fee, if any, should be very low. $10 or less for dogs under 25 lbs and $15 or less for dogs 26 lbs and larger. It should pay for upkeep and poop pickup bags. Why so low? Because it is a park for dogs! Grass, dirt, and some trees. Not the Opera or a Rolling Stones concert. A volunteer group needs to raise money first. It takes a few years and longer than you think. Starting with finding a location acceptable to all (nearly impossible due to NIMBY types but doable - Baur is actually a good pick) and hiring a landscape architect (pro bono hopefully) to design/lay it out to town code. There are many dog parks all over the U.S. that are proven and work well. Madison and this part of CT do need more fenced dog parks.
David Moloney May 21, 2013 at 10:07 am
The plan to let dogs off leash needs clarification. The park and the town are in the planning phasesRead More of a fenced off leach area that was designed by landscape architecture students from UCONN. This is part of the overall plan for the the park. The area slated for use is north of the Bauer Farmhouse on the other side of Copse road. It is in the wooded area on the other side of the brook abutting the cliffs. I agree dogs should be allowed off leash, however some dog owners are not in full control of their dogs, so the fenced off leash area is a good alternative for the safety and enjoyment of all.